首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk factors and protective factors associated with incident or increase of frailty among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review of longitudinal studies
【2h】

Risk factors and protective factors associated with incident or increase of frailty among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review of longitudinal studies

机译:与社区居民中老年人的事件或脆弱性增加相关的危险因素和保护因素:纵向研究的系统综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractIntroduction: Frailty is one of the greatest challenges facing our aging population, as it can lead to adverse outcomes such as institutionalization, hospitalization, and mortality. However, the factors that are associated with frailty are poorly understood. We performed a systematic review of longitudinal studies in order to identify the sociodemographic, physical, biological, lifestyle-related, and psychological risk or protective factors that are associated with frailty among community-dwelling older adults. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the following databases in order to identify studies that assessed the factors associated with of frailty among community-dwelling older adults: Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsychINFO Ovid, CINAHL EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar. Studies were selected if they included a longitudinal design, focused on community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and older, and used a tool to assess frailty. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research checklist. Results: Twenty-three studies were included. Significant associations were reported between the following types of factors and frailty: sociodemographic factors (7/7 studies), physical factors (5/6 studies), biological factors (5/7 studies), lifestyle factors (11/13 studies), and psychological factors (7/8 studies). Significant sociodemographic factors included older age, ethnic background, neighborhood, and access to private insurance or Medicare; significant physical factors included obesity and activities of daily living (ADL) functional status; significant biological factors included serum uric acid; significant lifestyle factors included a higher Diet Quality Index International (DQI) score, higher fruit/vegetable consumption and higher tertile of all measures of habitual dietary resveratrol exposure; significant psychological factors included depressive symptoms. Conclusions: A broad range of sociodemographic, physical, biological, lifestyle, and psychological factors show a longitudinal association with frailty. These factors should be considered when developing interventions aimed at preventing and/or reducing the burden associated with frailty among community-dwelling older adults.
机译:textabstract简介:脆弱是我们人口老龄化所面临的最大挑战之一,因为它可能导致不良后果,例如机构化,住院和死亡率。但是,与脆弱相关的因素了解得很少。我们对纵向研究进行了系统的综述,以确定与社区居住的老年人身体虚弱相关的社会人口统计学,身体,生物学,生活方式相关的心理风险或保护因素。方法:在以下数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,以鉴定评估社区居住的老年人中与体弱相关的因素的研究:Embase,Medline Ovid,Web of Science,Cochrane,PsychINFO Ovid,CINAHL EBSCOhost和谷歌学术。如果研究包括纵向设计,且研究对象是年龄在60岁及60岁以上的社区居住老年人,并使用评估脆弱性的工具,则选择这些研究。使用观察性纵向研究报告清单的质量评估每个研究的方法学质量。结果:包括二十三项研究。据报告,以下因素与脆弱性之间存在显着相关性:社会人口因素(7/7项研究),身体因素(5/6项研究),生物学因素(5/7项研究),生活方式因素(11/13项研究)和心理因素(7/8研究)。重要的社会人口统计学因素包括年龄,种族背景,邻居以及获得私人保险或医疗保险的机会;重要的身体因素包括肥胖和日常生活活动(ADL)功能状态;重要的生物学因素包括血清尿酸;重要的生活方式因素包括较高的国际饮食质量指数(DQI)评分,较高的水果/蔬菜消费量和所有习惯性饮食白藜芦醇暴露量的三分位数;重要的心理因素包括抑郁症状。结论:广泛的社会人口统计学,身体,生物学,生活方式和心理因素显示出与虚弱的纵向关系。在制定旨在预防和/或减轻社区居民老年人体弱相关的负担的干预措施时,应考虑这些因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号